The space shuttle had been said by some to have been more capable than we were led to believe. What I mean by this is that it could fly further into space and may have had the capability to reach the moon and orbit it. I have no way to know for sure if this is true, but it does seem as if the shuttle could fly a lot further out into space, because it has been reported the United States had built a space station further out which was hidden from us and to do this it would have been necessary for the shuttle to have a deeper space capability. There is a lot which went on in space and which is still going on which have produced anomalies. These anomalies have been hidden from us, because even though some of them have been recorded we would know nothing about them since they are not reported in the media. When it comes to what we see, there was a position at NASA called the INCO or Instrumentation and Communications Officer. He decided what we were allowed to see when live video was downloaded from the shuttle and remotely operated the shuttle bay cameras. There is an equivalent for the International Space Station known as the CATO or Communications and Tracking Officer who manages the International Space Station’s on orbit communication systems. Remember how the feed was cut a couple of times this year (January 2015)? This officer was responsible. He didn’t want us to see the UFO which appeared.

The INCO had a 20 second delay in the broadcast and a cutoff switch as does the CATO today. One can only imagine how much has been hidden from us. If we knew everything it could change our conception of the entire universe and the life within. NASA has used every trick in the book to hide things from us including making us think there was some sort of interference in the transmission when it was a technique designed by them to hide something they didn’t want us to see. A good point was made and it was that our television broadcasts are clear when they come from satellites in space, but yet when we view television from NASA which takes place at night and is also sent by satellite is has interference in a way we call snow. How can this be? It is because this is put there on purpose. So how do we know for sure what I have said about interference being created on purpose is true? There are a few times where the person in control of video has made a mistake. One time cameras were switched and all of a sudden the interference was gone. Another time things were clear, but then it was realized the interference was not on so it was switched on. This hasn’t happened much, but it has happened several times.

Interior views of the shuttle never had the interference mask and neither does interior views of the ISS, or International Space Station and the interference mask only seems to be used at night for some reason. It does stand to reason, because no one at NASA expects to see an anomaly in the interior of ships or space stations, but they are worried about us seeing them on the outside in space. It is said that STS-48 which took the famous video of a UFO running away from a missile shot at it from earth, was the reason the 20 second delay was instituted. NASA was never going to let us see anything like this again. When the Russian Progress rocket was docking at the space station a Russian controller complained about the video delay so we know for sure it is in effect. None of the masking routines which are used by NASA were strong enough to hide a UFO which went flying by STS-96. While STS-97 was in orbit at night a very bright pulsating circular object flew by and was visible on the shuttle camera. The same shuttle mission captured a UFO on video which is amazing. As the shuttle drifted over Florida there was an electrical storm and the payload bay camera captured 21 UFOs in the storm. STS-97 had its camera aimed at Houston at night as it flew over. What happened next was amazing. A UFO streaked over Houston at incredible speed and then a second object flew over Houston, slowed down and dimmed.Β  While I didn’t mention all of them, four different events took place on this flight and it must have been a life altering experience for at least some of the crew.

STS-101 actually had its camera aimed at Earth and was over Louisiana when a very bright pulsating object was picked up by it. While NASA watched the pulsating object seemed to be coming closer to the shuttle, but then NASA changed the view. Did the object actually come up to the shuttle? We will probably never know. We do know one thing however and that is Clark McClelland said he was a spacecraft operator for NASA for 34 years and worked on the Mercury flights, Apollo missions and the International Space Station along with the shuttle flights. He states he was at a video monitor while on duty at the Kennedy Space Center and saw an 8 to 9 foot extraterrestrial being in the Space Shuttle Payload Bay who was having a discussion with two tethered US NASA Astronauts. He also said others saw it too. He did not say which flight this was observed on.

STS-106 had its cameras pointed at the Great Lakes area. Four UFOs came into view and three of them were flying in a triangle formation. Another strange thing was they were flying below the shuttle at exactly the same speed as the shuttle. A second event occurred on the same shuttle. Two UFOs flew under the shuttle while it was over Chicago. Many anomalous events have occurred with space shuttle flights. If one were to examine all these events what other conclusion could they reach besides the UFOs seen being from somewhere else other than this planet. This is based on their performance and the fact a couple of times aliens were reported making contact. It also seems to me if these objects were ours, NASA would have known to stay away from them, but when they appear NASA seems to be very surprised and that is why they are caught on video in the first place. There is so much more going on in and near our planet that we are privy to. Could this be one of the reasons we were never told about the replacement for the space shuttle? Yes it must have been replaced and like most other military projects, yes NASA is actually operating under a military charter, it must have been thought to keep it secret and that way no more live streams from our fleet have to be shown to the public.