Analyzing The NASA Announcement About Mars

I began writing this article during a power outage using Office 2013 on my Microsoft Surface device. Thank goodness the power came back on, because it is so much easier for me to use a conventional keyboard than the small one on the Surface. Today I want to talk about Mars and how it ties in with the secrecy this country puts over everything. I don’t know how many of you watched the NASA announcement about Mars, it was quite informative, not so much for the information we gained, because many of us suspected this already, but even more so for the implications that NASA and the government have been hiding information about Mars from the public.

Let’s start not with the announcement of water on the Red Planet, but with the announcement that the soil is moist. Moist soil? We have been led to believe Mars was dry and dusty and now we hear it has moist soil. I almost feel like writing to NASA and asking them about all the other announcements about how dry the soil was and why they changed what they said. What is the big deal about moist soil you might ask? Check out moist soil on earth and what do you see? You will find worms, insects, bacteria and other life. By telling us Mars has moist soil are we really being told there are at least bacteria on Mars? If there is it does not mean it is native to Mars. We have been sending vehicles there for some time. Viking 1 was the first vehicle to touch the surface of Mars and that was in 1976. We know now at least one of the rovers was not sterilized properly and even those we are told were, were not.

This means that if we find microbes in the Martian soil they may be the same as the ones on earth, but this is only the microbes. Could there be other things in the soil which are being kept from us? It is known that sometimes we are given clues by NASA employees who want us to know what is really going on, but don’t want to risk their jobs. Could telling us the soil was moist really be a clue indicating life exists on Mars and not just in the soil? When you talk about moist soil don’t you also think of plants? I do and there have been some reports of trees on Mars which have been pushed to the side. The reason for the reports is photos were taken which seem to show trees, but we have never heard any more about it. It was said the trees were an optical illusion. Keep in mind we are talking about Mars and trees there could look different than trees here. You can see one of the photos and story by copying and pasting this address into your web browser: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6979855/Nasa-photographs-trees-on-Mars.html Sorry Truth Facts doesn’t use live links.

If there are plants and trees on Mars what could this mean? It could mean there is animal life of some type and maybe more of an atmosphere than we have been told. This would explain one of the mysteries of Mars. Scientists have found methane gas and I have never heard a good explanation for it. We know animals on earth give off methane and it has been said cows pollute as much as cars with their release of gas. I remember one scientist saying the most methane was found near caves on Mars. Where does the most methane gas come from on earth? It comes from wetlands, termites, oceans, livestock, and landfills, but it also comes from the processing and use of fossil fuels. We are told Mars has no oceans, so we can eliminate that cause. Look at the causes which are left and it seems there almost has to be some cause which would startle us.

NASA also announced there was water on Mars which flowed at certain times of the year. This seems to end the constant statements which announced water, no water, water and no water. Frankly I am tired of this off and on process. From the tone of the announcement I would bet anything NASA has known about water on Mars for many years. I am sure they have scrutinized every photo until they wore off the coatings. What will be the next thing they tell us, will it be there are more places on Mars where there is water? I wouldn’t be surprised, would you? The runs and markings of where water flowed were pretty obvious on the photo we were shown. We know many of the NASA photos have been airbrushed, so we really do not know how many other locations might have looked the same. This leaves the question of why this information is being released now. Could it be some other country is threading to release it so NASA had to tell us, after all anyone who has followed them for years as I have knows they are very stingy with important information and especially information which might indicate alien life?

 Whistleblowers from NASA have indicated they knew we had already put people on Mars, because they saw them when live pictures were being sent back to NASA and NASA reacted by turning off all the monitors in their unit. The people then scrambled up to another office and the doors were locked, but they could see through the glass and saw on another monitor that there was a person walking on the surface of Mars and he was said to be wearing some type of light space suit or suit. Many have long thought we have been lied to about Mars not having an atmosphere and if there is a photo of this guy somewhere it could be the smoking gun.

Mars may be called the mysterious planet, but NASA has made it even more mysterious with its secrets. So many investigators have said there are ruins there and they can be seen in some of the thousands of photos taken by NASA which may have slipped through the detection mechanism, whether on purpose or by accident. It is very hard to believe an agency which tells us they “LOST” all the boxes which contained the Apollo landing tapes. I am tired of politicians telling us they lost things. Can you imagine want you employer would do if you were asked by your employer where a certain things were and you kept saying you lost pen? Yes the NASA announcement was interesting, but it may have been more interesting for what it didn’t say directly than what it did say.