Ancient Footprints The world can be a hard place at times, it can also be one which at times makes one very happy to be alive. There can be things found which challenge our knowledge of history and even our knowledge of the universe. It turns out no matter how much we think we know, there is always more to learn and correct. That particular point is why I always say theories come and go and even those that might have been around a long time might prove to be wrong or incomplete in the future. One of the things that bothers me is when scientists find something that doesn’t fit into our current thinking so they just don’t mention it or sometimes even refuse to examine it when found. One thing I am fascinated by is the ancient footprints which have been found might prove the human race has been around maybe for millions of years. Barefoot prints have been found but there are also prints of shoes which look very modern and yet some say were millions of years old, while others claim they are more than 500,000 years old. It is claimed when they were sent to a geologist, he said he refused to look at them. He must have been so scared of what he might have to admit to because of peer pressure. It was said even the impression of the sole’s stitching could be seen. If we check around search engines, we find the oldest human footprints are said to be 153,000 years old. While this is not too shabby, it does come close to what I am talking about. It is being said a footprint discovery has created turmoil among scientists. While scientists which were archaeologists were poking around in one of the richest archaeology areas, Crete in Greece, they supposedly found footprints. These were not 100,000 years old or even 1,000,000, they were said to be 5.7 million years old. They called the footprint human like. I guess they didn’t want to stick their necks out further than necessary. Even giving them the benefit of the doubt, 5.7 million years is a really long time ago even for a so called human relative to be around. Even if we believe their idea of walking upright started in Africa, then we have to wonder how these footprints got to Greece don’t we? I would like to hear an intelligent reason why modern human footprints were found right next to dinosaur ones, when the dinosaurs were wiped out 66 million years ago. The best excuse scientist can come up with to try and disprove the footprints is erosion has made the footprints look like human ones. They have even claimed they could be carvings. Give me a break. The next thing they will be saying is swamp gas caused them. Looking at the excuses in reverse order, the idea of carving footprint would have left tool marks and the erosion excuse means every footprint had to be eroded. I am not saying the scientists are absolutely wrong but I am saying they were probably bias against the idea of human footprints existing so far back before they even examined them. My point is who would want to be the one to say they were human prints and face the wrath of their fellows? It is sort of like a scientist coming out and saying he or she had proof UFOs are not only alien but he has met with an extraterrestrial, or saying he or she has proof evolution doesn’t exist for humans. The oldest modern human footprints science will admit to so far were found in Langebaan Lagoon, South Africa. They were estimated to be 117,000 years old. See how nicely they fit the accepted dialog. They were found in Africa, the place where scientists say we all come from. If they would have found way older modern human footprints there, I wonder what they would have done? Probably ignored them I imagine, or come up with some elaborate excuse for the creation of them. Did you know human footprints were found in a NASA photo which was enlarged and they were of a man’s dress shoe. Were there human like Martins who went around in their Sunday best? When it was found it raised all sorts of questions and comments on the internet. I have seen the photo and yet when I tried to Google it, it came up as no shoe print found on Mars. There are things being found which could indicate there were more advanced races than us here at one time. Unfortunately, if it wasn’t for the ancient Indian scrips we might not have known, but these scripts describe ancient wars with flying machines that could go into space and nuclear weapons being used. This info had to come from somewhere. This proves one thing to me, these people had to come from a place with advanced technology. They could have been a very ancient people or space travelers and they left their imprint. Their description of a nuclear attack and the results are impossible to get so accurate unless one sees it firsthand or is told about it. Since there are a couple of places on earth with seem to be the victim of an ancient nuclear attack, I have to think the story is true. I have written previous articles about this. There is something which seems to be occurring in archaeology and that is some of the objects which were dated are now estimated to possibly be much older. If we keep finding older ancient footprints, isn’t it possible, we will find some so old they might baffle us? The problem is the earth is our enemy when it comes to finding things like that. There seems to be a point in time where it is almost impossible to find more objects and even modern human footprints. Could this be because even if a technologically advanced race existed, all signs of their existence were wiped out by erosion. If there was an advanced race or races in very ancient times, there might have been a far smaller population on earth to leave indications they were here, and that is another problem. There is one more thing I would like to ponder. Could that ancient race still be here? Perhaps they are piloting the strange craft in our skies right now and the idea extraterrestrials are here is wrong and it is just our ancestors.
|
